Estoppel by Conduct and Election

..................................................................................................................................................................................................
Description
Developments since the first edition have more than justified a second. In Cobbe v Yeomans Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 1752 and Thorner v Major [2009] 1 WLR 776 the House of Lords ignored the siren call of unconscionability as either, in the former a sufficient, or in the latter a necessary element in estoppel by encouragement. In the former the House also rejected an attempt to use this form of estoppel to enforce an incomplete commercial bargain. In both cases the Lords maintained the distinction between promissory and proprietary estoppel. 
................................................................................................................
Contents
Chapter 1 :    Introduction
Chapter 2 :    Representations
Chapter 3 :    Communication
Chapter 4 :    Construction of Representations
Chapter 5 :    Causation : Inducement, Change of Position and Detriment
Chapter 6 :    Parties to an Estoppel
Chapter 7 :    Estoppel by Deed
Chapter 8 :    Estoppel by Convention
Chapter 9 :    Estoppels in Relationships
Chapter 10 :  Estoppels in Transactions
Chapter 11 :  Proprietary Estoppel
Chapter 12 :  Quasi-Estoppel and Equitable Defences
Chapter 13 :  Promissory Estoppel
Chapter 14 :  Election
Chapter 15 :  Estoppels and Election in Proceedings
Chapter 16 :  Affirmative Answers
Chapter 17 :  Practice and Procedure
................................................................................................................